linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:54:37 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Valentin Manea <valy@....ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 23:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 13:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Just a nitpick: Can we leave S2IDLE instead of S2I?
> > Would it make sense for potential code readers?
> 
> I wanted it to be shorter, but if that is a problem, I'd rather call
> it PLATFORM than S2IDLE (as technically they are related to the
> low-power mode of the platform).

It's not problem per se, though without a context it would take time to
get into S2I acronym from the code for not familiar reader.

> I'll send an update shortly.

Thanks!

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy