lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 20:29:12 +0000
From:   Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support

Hi Sudeep,

There are 3 things:

1> IPI mailbox transport - series is already posted
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10145795/
2> EEMI - Posted by me below
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10150665/
3> EEMI Users
Currently posted as RFC as they are dependent on #2.

#2 doesn’t use mailbox so it is a posted as a separate series. 

Thanks,
Jolly Shah



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@....com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:55 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; michal.simek@...inx.com; linux-
> clk@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...eaurora.org; Sudeep Holla
> <sudeep.holla@....com>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/01/18 22:16, Jolly Shah wrote:
> > Add clock driver for ZynqMP
> >
> 
> Can you post the complete series in one set for easy of review. It's currently
> broken into *6 - 8* different sets by different authors and it's extremely hard to
> get the full view of how these pieces are connected and extremely misleading.
> Can someone post them collectively as you would already have it if you are
> doing some testing building on each patch set.
> 
> IIUC mailbox is used for all the communication, right ?
> If so, to start with just have 2 series one for mailbox/transport and another for
> the whole protocol(eemi?) and users of it.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ