lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:24:23 +0800
From:   "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule with each
 possisble CPU

Hi ming

Thanks for your kindly response.

On 01/17/2018 11:52 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> It is here.
>> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue()
>> ....
>>     WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
>>         cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));
> I think this warning is triggered after the CPU of hctx->next_cpu becomes
> online again, and it should have been dealt with by the following trick,
> and this patch is against the previous one, please test it and see if
> the warning can be fixed.
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 23f0f3ddffcf..0620ccb65e4e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1452,6 +1452,9 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  			tried = true;
>  			goto select_cpu;
>  		}
> +
> +		/* handle after this CPU of hctx->next_cpu becomes online again */
> +		hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
>  		return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
>  	}
>  	return hctx->next_cpu;
> 

The WARNING still could be triggered.

[  282.194532] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 222 at /home/will/u04/source_code/linux-block/block/blk-mq.c:1315 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x92/0xa0
[  282.194534] Modules linked in: ....
[  282.194561] CPU: 0 PID: 222 Comm: kworker/2:1H Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7+ #17
[  282.194562] Hardware name: LENOVO 10MLS0E339/3106, BIOS M1AKT22A 06/27/2017
[  282.194563] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  282.194565] RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x92/0xa0
[  282.194565] RSP: 0018:ffff96c50223be60 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  282.194566] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8a7110233800 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  282.194567] RDX: ffff8a711255f2d0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8a7110233800
[  282.194567] RBP: ffff8a7122ca2140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  282.194568] R10: 0000000000000263 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a7122ca8200
[  282.194568] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0ffff8a7122ca820 R15: ffff8a70bcef0780
[  282.194569] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a7122c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  282.194569] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  282.194570] CR2: 0000555e14d89d60 CR3: 000000003c809002 CR4: 00000000003606f0
[  282.194571] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  282.194571] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  282.194571] Call Trace:
[  282.194576]  process_one_work+0x14b/0x420
[  282.194577]  worker_thread+0x47/0x420
[  282.194579]  kthread+0xf5/0x130
[  282.194581]  ? process_one_work+0x420/0x420
[  282.194581]  ? kthread_associate_blkcg+0xe0/0xe0
[  282.194583]  ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[  282.194585] Code: ff 48 89 df e8 e0 6b 00 00 8b 74 24 04 48 89 df e8 a4 fc ff ff 48 8b 44 24 08 65 48 33 04 25 28 00 00 00 75 0e 48 83 c4 10 5b c3 <0f> ff eb b7 0f ff eb c1 e8 e1 02 c6 ff 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 
[  282.194601] ---[ end trace c104f0a63d3df31b ]---

>> ....
>>
>> To eliminate this risk totally, we could blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu return the cpu  even if the cpu is offlined and modify the cpu_online above to cpu_active.
>> The kworkers of the per-cpu pool must have be migrated back when the cpu is set active.
>> But there seems to be issues in DASD as your previous comment.
> Yes, we can't break DASD.
> 
>> That is the original version of this patch, and both Christian and Stefan
>> reported that system can't boot from DASD in this way[2], and I changed
>> to AND with cpu_online_mask, then their system can boot well
>> On the other hand, there is also risk in 
>>
>> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>>  		blk_queue_exit(q);
>>  		return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
>>  	}
>> -	cpu = cpumask_first(alloc_data.hctx->cpumask);
>> +	cpu = cpumask_first_and(alloc_data.hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
>>  	alloc_data.ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpu);
>>
>> what if the cpus in alloc_data.hctx->cpumask are all offlined ?
> This one is crazy, and is used by NVMe only, it should be fine if
> the passed 'hctx_idx' is retrieved by the current running CPU, such
> as the way of blk_mq_map_queue(). But if not, bad thing may happen.
Even if retrieved by current running cpu, the task still could be migrated away when the cpu is offlined.

Thanks
Jianchao


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ