linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Fix comment style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:37:45 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Fabian Huegel <fabian_huegel@....de>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@...el.com>,
        "John L . Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Ben Evans <bevans@...y.com>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de,
        Christoph Volkert <linux@...istoph-volkert.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Fix comment style

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:53:59PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 16:51 +0100, Fabian Huegel wrote:
> > Most multi-line comments started on the first line, but the preferred
> > linux kernel style is to start multi-line comments on the second line.
> > Some comments became less readable after the change, so we changed them
> > to single-line comments.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_class.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_class.h
> > 
> > @@ -182,7 +179,8 @@ struct config_llog_data {
> >  	struct obd_export	  *cld_mgcexp;
> >  	struct mutex		    cld_lock;
> >  	int			 cld_type;
> > -	unsigned int		cld_stopping:1, /* we were told to stop
> > +	unsigned int		cld_stopping:1, /*
> > +						 * we were told to stop
> >  						 * watching
> >  						 */
> >  				cld_lostlock:1; /* lock not requeued */
> 
> probably better for both of these to be bool
> instead of bitfield.

That's a change best left for a separate patch :)

thanks,

greg k-h