linux-kernel - Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:35:25 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mw@...ihalf.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
        nadavh@...vell.com, neta@...vell.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        jaz@...ihalf.com, tn@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100

> There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under
> initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were
> for now abandoned from further re-sends.

But doesn't the results of that discussion determine whether the way ACPI
is being used in this patch series is what we want to do or not?