linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/53] 4.4.113-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 07:39:10 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>, Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/53] 4.4.113-stable review

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:19:07AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 14:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.113 release.
> > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 24 08:38:52 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.113-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

Thanks for letting me know how they all worked.

> NOTE:
> On arm64 Hikey620 device cpufreq test failed.
> We are suspecting due to missing config on Hikey620
> CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y
> You may ignore this now. because it is coming from internal tree.
> https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git

Is this new?  That shouldn't have been something that changed in this
kernel release, maybe a few releases ago?  There has been a push to sync
some of the hikey patches into the stable tree to make testing like this
easier for you to do, hopefully it isn't breaking anything...

thanks,

greg k-h