linux-kernel - Re: mfd: Patch management?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:56:27 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lars Pöschel <poeschel@...onage.de>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: mfd: Patch management?

> My preferred mailer (Mutt) re-orders replied-to mails by putting them
> to the top of my Inbox.  At which point I have to re-navigate down to
> the next patch to review.

How much does this tool influence the amount of update suggestions
which you could handle easily and safely?

> This is fine for most submissions, but you have fired ~30,
> mostly individual patches at me.

This number could be appropriate. I tried to contribute hundreds
of change possibilities for various software components.

> I'd like you to do the following please:

It will take a while until you might get the next chance to take
another look at these subsequent patches.

Regards,
Markus