linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: use a correct at24 fallback for at91-nattis-2-natte-2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:48:59 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: use a correct at24 fallback for at91-nattis-2-natte-2

2018-01-24 23:12 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>:
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On 2018-01-24 22:34, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> We now require all at24 users to use the "atmel,<model>" fallback in
>> device tree for different manufacturers.
>
> I think my patch [3/4] from about a week ago was just a tiny bit
> better.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/609
>
> Can we please pick that one directly instead of doing this partial
> step?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter

Hi Peter,

oh yes, sorry - I just grepped the entire code base from next for
invalid compatibles and didn't notice this was already fixed by you.
Let's drop it.

Thanks,
Bartosz