linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: sprd: Use 'spi_master_put()' instead of 'spi_controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:32:18 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: sprd: Use 'spi_master_put()' instead of
 'spi_controller_put()'

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:16:34PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> > 'spi_alloc_master()' calls should be balanced by a 'spi_master_put()' call.

> > 'spi_controller_put()' is equivalent (see include/linux/spi/spi.h) but it
> > is cleaner and more logical to use 'spi_master_put()'.

> My intention was to phase out the spi_master_* names, and remove them
> when there are no users left.

Yeah, a better change here would be adding the matching allocation
function and using that.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)