lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 27 Jan 2018 15:26:23 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        samitolvanen@...gle.com, alxmtvv@...il.com,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] Kbuild, lto: Add Link Time Optimization support

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 01:15:49AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> > - Add a new LDFINAL variable that controls the final link
>> > for vmlinux or module. In this case we call gcc-ld instead
>> > of ld, to run the LTO step.
>>
>> When I tried this out on allmodconfig (following the lwn article), I ran into
>> a number of warnings:
>
> Thanks for testing. Yes it's a known issue: during one module build
> when modpost looks at the file it is still in LTO format, and
> modpost doesn't understand the LTO symbol table. I had a patch
> to teach it to it at some point, but it got lost somewhere.
> The LLVM LTO patchkit has a different solution that actually
> fixes the sequence to run modpost only after a LTO final link,
> but I haven't gotten around to port that one.
>
> It seems to work already for the single file modules.

Ok, I see. I've turned off that warning now for testing.

What about this one:

kallsyms failure: relative symbol value 0xffffffff81000000 out of
range in relative mode

I seem to get that all the time here, and have also disabled it for now,
but it sounds important (and breaks the build).

      Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ