linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Cc:     Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
        Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:43:30 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:24:01 +0000
>> Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org> wrote:
>> > On 12/10/2017 12:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:52:34 +0000
>> > > Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org> wrote:

>> > >> Some BOSC0200 acpi_device-s describe two accelerometers in a single ACPI
>> > >> device. Check for a companion device and handle a second i2c_client
>> > >> if it is present.

>> > I didn't see this land anywhere (I was looking in
>> > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git, maybe that's not
>> > the right place?) and I just wanted to make sure this didn't get lost in
>> > the holiday shuffle.
>> It did indeed get lost - thanks for the reminder.  Now applied to the
>> togreg branch of iio.git.  However, unfortunately we may be too near
>> to the merge window opening for it to make it.  Depends on what Linus
>> says later today when rc8 comes out.
>
> I've added some #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI defenses against the case
> of no ACPI support being compiled in.  Alternative would be to add
> stubs for those functions that don't have them...
>
> probably just acpi_device_hid.
>
> But that would take much longer.  Feel free to propose it and a patch
> removing the ifdef fun if you like!

Where can I see the patch?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko