lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:22:16 +0000
From:   Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
        "daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gabriel.fernandez.st@...il.com" <gabriel.fernandez.st@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32: Add DSI clock for STM32F469 Board

Hi Rob,

Thanks for reviewing.


On 01/29/2018 07:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 03:49:40PM +0100, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>>
>> This patch adds DSI clock for STM32F469 board
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                 | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h |  3 ++-
>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> index da44f8d..3c28798 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ struct stm32f4_pll_data {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct stm32f4_pll_data stm32f469_pll[MAX_PLL_DIV] = {
>> -	{ PLL,	   50, { "pll",	     "pll-q",    NULL	    } },
>> +	{ PLL,	   50, { "pll",	     "pll-q",    "pll-r"    } },
>>   	{ PLL_I2S, 50, { "plli2s-p", "plli2s-q", "plli2s-r" } },
>>   	{ PLL_SAI, 50, { "pllsai-p", "pllsai-q", "pllsai-r" } },
>>   };
>> @@ -1047,6 +1047,8 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>>   	"no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const char *dsi_parent[2] = { NULL, "pll-r" };
>> +
>>   static const char *lcd_parent[1] = { "pllsai-r-div" };
>>   
>>   static const char *i2s_parents[2] = { "plli2s-r", NULL };
>> @@ -1156,6 +1158,12 @@ struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>>   		NO_GATE, 0,
>>   		0
>>   	},
>> +	{
>> +		CLK_F469_DSI, "dsi", dsi_parent, ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_parent),
>> +		STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 29, 1,
>> +		STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 27,
>> +		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT
>> +	},
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct stm32_aux_clk stm32f746_aux_clk[] = {
>> @@ -1450,6 +1458,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   	stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
>>   
>>   	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>> +	dsi_parent[0] = hse_clk;
>>   
>>   	i2s_in_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 1);
>>   
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
>> index 4d523b0..58d8b51 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
>> @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
>>   #define CLK_SAIQ_PDIV		13
>>   #define CLK_HSI			14
>>   #define CLK_SYSCLK		15
>> +#define CLK_F469_DSI		16
>>   
>> -#define END_PRIMARY_CLK		16
>> +#define END_PRIMARY_CLK		17
>>   
>>   #define CLK_HDMI_CEC		16
>>   #define CLK_SPDIF		17
> This looks suspicious. What's the relationship of these clocks?
I have just added CLK_F469_DSI in the binding, and shifted the end of 
primary clock for F4 clocks.

'CLK_F469_DSI' binding is only used for STM32F469 and not for STM32F746 
(that why CLK_HDMI_CEC can use the index 16)


BR

Gabriel.
>
> Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ