linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:13:05 +0100
From:   Dongsu Park <dongsu@...volk.io>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
        Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>,
        Iago López Galeiras <iago@...volk.io>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Dongsu Park <dongsu@...volk.io> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 06:56 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
...
>> Did you get a chance to make the change and test it?
>
> Alban has been on holidays, so he will be back on Wednesday or so.
> So I'll try to understand what you meant in the last email.
>
> As IMA_DONE_MASK contains all other bitmasks, it's possible to
> optimize the code like this:
>
>         if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags)) {
>                 iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
>         } else if (inode->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_IMA_NO_CACHE) {
>                 iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
>                 if (action & IMA_MEASURE)
>                         iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
>         }
>
> Is that what you want to see? Please let me know if it's not.
> Tomorrow I will try to test with a new patch.

Today I created a new patch, and tested it. It worked fine.
So I've just sent a new patchset v4. Please see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1598387.html

Thanks,
Dongsu

> Thanks,
> Dongsu
>
>> Mimi
>>