linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 14/18] firmware/psci: Expose SMCCC version through psci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:48:30 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Jayachandran C <jnair@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/18] firmware/psci: Expose SMCCC version through
 psci_ops

On 01/02/18 12:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 01/02/18 11:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Since PSCI 1.0 allows the SMCCC version to be (indirectly) probed,
>> let's do that at boot time, and expose the version of the calling
>> convention as part of the psci_ops structure.
>>
>> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/psci.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/psci.h    |  6 ++++++
>>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> index e9493da2b111..8631906c414c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ bool psci_tos_resident_on(int cpu)
>>   
>>   struct psci_operations psci_ops = {
>>   	.conduit = PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE,
>> +	.smccc_version = SMCCC_VERSION_1_0,
>>   };
>>   
>>   typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
>> @@ -511,6 +512,23 @@ static void __init psci_init_migrate(void)
>>   	pr_info("Trusted OS resident on physical CPU 0x%lx\n", cpuid);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void __init psci_init_smccc(u32 ver)
>> +{
>> +	int feature;
>> +
>> +	feature = psci_features(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID);
>> +
>> +	if (feature != PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> +		ver = invoke_psci_fn(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID, 0, 0, 0);
>> +		if (ver != ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
>> +			psci_ops.smccc_version = SMCCC_VERSION_1_0;
> 
> AFAICS, unless you somehow run psci_probe() twice *and* have 
> schizophrenic firmware, this assignment now does precisely nothing.

That's a leftover of a previous tracing hack I had...  Embarrassing.

> With the condition flipped and the redundant else case removed (or an 
> explanation of why I'm wrong...)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...