[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:40:04 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Fix period/freq terms setup
Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:28:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:45:46AM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Otherwise, I tested what you have written so far and it works.
> So I take that as a Tested-by: Stephane and will apply the patches, Jiri
> can continue working on these other aspects, right?
I also added this for the casual reader to get up to speed more quickly,
please check that it makes sense.
Committer note:
When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
need to ask the kernel, via perf_event_attr.sample_type |=
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample, as we know
it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists