linux-kernel - Re: asm-generic: Disallow no-op mb() for SMP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Feb 2018 21:08:20 +0000
From:   Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: asm-generic: Disallow no-op mb() for SMP systems

On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 21:25:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 04:00:35AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:  
> 
> Seriously? Bots have feelings?
> 
> > [auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.15 next-20180202]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> > 
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Zijlstra/asm-generic-Disallow-no-op-mb-for-SMP-systems/20180203-000108
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
> > config: m32r-usrv_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: m32r-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.2.0  
> 
> Awesome, another broken architecture.. and this one is Orphaned :-(
> No maintainer to bug..

Renesas claim to still support the processor family so perhaps they can
provide a maintainer if you instead submit a patch to remove it from the
tree ;-)

>From the documentation however the processor only does explicit dual
issue instructions, and the SMP is cache coherent so I'm not convinced
there is a problem with it.


Alan