lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:04:55 +0100
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/entry: Clear registers for 64bit
 exceptions/interrupts

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:18:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> @@ -1178,6 +1180,7 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
>  	cld
>  	SAVE_C_REGS 8
>  	SAVE_EXTRA_REGS 8
> +	CLEAR_REGS_NOSPEC
>  	ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER 8
>  	movl	$1, %ebx
>  	movl	$MSR_GS_BASE, %ecx
> @@ -1185,7 +1188,6 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
>  	testl	%edx, %edx
>  	js	1f				/* negative -> in kernel */
>  	SWAPGS
> -	xorl	%ebx, %ebx

Here, %ebx will be filled with $1 (see code snipped above) *after* the
call to CLEAR_REGS_NOSPEC. That's what this line has been clearing in the
past. So I'm not sure whether this line should be removed.

Thanks,
	Dominik

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ