linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:16:16 +0100
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched 
        <bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
        Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>, ming.lei@...hat.com,
        ivan@...ios.org, 169364@...denti.unimore.it,
        Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook

Hi.

06.02.2018 12:57, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Not me.  Box seems to be fairly sure that it is bfq.  Twice again box
> went belly up on me in fairly short order with bfq, but seemed fine
> with deadline.  I'm currently running deadline again, and box again
> seems solid, thought I won't say _is_ solid until it's been happily
> trundling along with deadline for a quite a bit longer.

Sorry for the noise, but just to make it clear, are we talking about 
"deadline" or "mq-deadline" now?