lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:32:54 -0800
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
        mhocko@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        mawilcox@...rosoft.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/64] mm: teach pagefault paths about range locking

On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:

>> --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
>> @@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ static void get_clear_fault_map(struct gru_state *gru,
>>   */
>>  static int non_atomic_pte_lookup(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  				 unsigned long vaddr, int write,
>> -				 unsigned long *paddr, int *pageshift)
>> +				 unsigned long *paddr, int *pageshift,
>> +				 struct range_lock *mmrange)
>>  {
>>  	struct page *page;
>>
>> @@ -198,7 +199,8 @@ static int non_atomic_pte_lookup(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  #else
>>  	*pageshift = PAGE_SHIFT;
>>  #endif
>> -	if (get_user_pages(vaddr, 1, write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, &page, NULL) <= 0)
>> +	if (get_user_pages(vaddr, 1, write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0,
>> +			   &page, NULL, mmrange) <= 0)
>
>There is no need to pass down the range here since underlying called
>__get_user_pages_locked() is told to not unlock the mmap_sem.
>In general get_user_pages() doesn't need a range parameter.

Yeah, you're right. At least it was a productive exercise for auditing.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ