lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:15:30 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] BUILD REGRESSION a2e5790d841658485d642196dbb0927303d6c22f

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> But yes, for our purposes UD2 is perfectly fine too, it will just mess
> up the people doing bringup and the like.

Oh, we'll inconvenience people inside Intel?

The same people who changed and screwed up the definition of UD0 just
a couple of months ago?

I'm *so* sorry for the inconvenience to those people /s.

F*ck them. They introduced the problem, they get to live with it.

                 Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ