lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:34:30 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
        claudio@...dence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it,
        bristot@...hat.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, tkjos@...roid.com,
        joelaf@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, patrick.bellasi@....com,
        alessio.balsini@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched/deadline: merge dl_bw into dl_bandwidth

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:40:28 +0100
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:

> + *  - dl_bw (< 100%) is the bandwidth of the system (domain) on each CPU;
> + *  - dl_total_bw array contains the currently allocated bandwidth on the
> + *    i-eth CPU.

The comment for dl_total_bw doesn't make sense. You mean that
dl_total_bw is the cpu's bandwidth? If so, let's not call it total,
because that would suggest it's the bandwidth of all CPUs. What about
dl_cpu_bw?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ