linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 43/92] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:56:03 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        karahmed@...zon.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 43/92] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are
 not vulnerable to Meltdown

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:09:44AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > So, any hints on what you think should be the correct fix here?
> 
> the patch sure looks correct to me, it now has a nice table for CPU IDs
> including all of AMD (and soon hopefully the existing Intel ones that are not exposed to meltdown)

I don't think the table is nice, it's a white list that would need
to be maintained forever.

-Andi