lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:32:50 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] x86: Use global pages when PTI is disabled

On 02/15/2018 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> @@ -319,6 +319,12 @@ static inline void set_cpu_pti_disable(unsigned short disable)
>>         WARN_ON_ONCE(preemptible());
>>
>>         pti_update_user_cs64(cpu_pti_disable(), disable);
>> +       if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_GLOBAL) {
>> +               if (disable)
>> +                       cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PGE);
>> +               else
>> +                       cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_PGE);
>> +       }
> This will be *extremely* slow, and I don't see the point at all.  What
> are you accomplishing here?

It won't be slow if you always run compat processes, I guess.

But mixing these in here will eat a big chunk of the benefit of having
global pages (or PCIDs for that matter) in the first place.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ