linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/108] 4.4.116-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:51:25 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/108] 4.4.116-stable review

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:45:08PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:15:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.116 release.
> > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Feb 17 15:11:36 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.116-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.
> 
> The v4l2-ioctl32 commits were interesting to sift through merging... I
> think I got everything correct though, the changes are in my trees under
> temporary tags if anyone cares to check them out:
> 
> https://github.com/nathanchance/wahoo/commits/queue-2.17
> https://github.com/nathanchance/op5/commits/queue-3.10

Thanks for that, yes, those are going to be an "interesting" merge :(

> So far, there have been no visible regressions in dmesg or general
> usage (I focused pretty heavily in the video area since those were the
> biggest changes).

thanks for testing and letting us know.

greg k-h