lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:17:11 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/41] perf tools: Fix comment for sort__* compare functions

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

In commit 2f15bd8c6c6e ("perf tools: Fix "Command" sort_entry's cmp and
collapse function") we switched from pointer to string comparison.

But failed to remove related comments. Removing them and adding another
one to warn before pointer comparison in here.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180206181813.10943-18-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/sort.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index 2da4d0456a03..e8514f651865 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -111,17 +111,20 @@ struct sort_entry sort_thread = {
 
 /* --sort comm */
 
+/*
+ * We can't use pointer comparison in functions below,
+ * because it gives different results based on pointer
+ * values, which could break some sorting assumptions.
+ */
 static int64_t
 sort__comm_cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
 {
-	/* Compare the addr that should be unique among comm */
 	return strcmp(comm__str(right->comm), comm__str(left->comm));
 }
 
 static int64_t
 sort__comm_collapse(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
 {
-	/* Compare the addr that should be unique among comm */
 	return strcmp(comm__str(right->comm), comm__str(left->comm));
 }
 
-- 
2.14.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ