linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:58:41 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
        mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
        richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c on UML)

On 02/21/2018 02:48 PM, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2018-02-21-14-48 has been uploaded to
> 
>    http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> 
> mmotm-readme.txt says
> 
> README for mm-of-the-moment:
> 
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> 
> This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue.  Uploaded at random hopefully
> more than once a week.
> 
> You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (4.x
> or 4.x-rcY).  The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series
> 
> The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
> .DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss.  Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
> followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
> be applied.

um (or uml) defconfig on i386 and/or x86_64:

../mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'memmap_init_zone':
../mm/page_alloc.c:5450:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_next_valid_pfn' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn, end_pfn) - 1;
     ^


probably (?):
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Subject: mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns on UMA


-- 
~Randy