linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:23:47 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

2018-02-21 10:11 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 05:56:52PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-01-29 17:17 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:
>> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> >> Makes them easier to find.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>> >> ---
>> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > This one should go into 4.16. I can apply after rc1 or apply to tree
>> > with at24.txt changes queued.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> >
>> > Rob
>>
>> Wolfram,
>>
>> can you take this via the i2c tree for 4.16?
>
> I missed this mail because I leave at24 patches to you now.
> Please send pull requests for patches I shall take. Least room for
> confusion (I hope).
>

Will do. What about this (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/867169/)
one? It's part of a bigger series, do you want me to apply it to my
tree and provide you with an immutable branch?

Bart