| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:00:24 +0000
From: Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Przemyslaw Sroka <psroka@...ence.com>,
Arkadiusz Golec <agolec@...ence.com>,
Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
Bartosz Folta <bfolta@...ence.com>,
Damian Kos <dkos@...ence.com>,
Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak <alicja@...ence.com>,
Cyprian Wronka <cwronka@...ence.com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Add the I3C subsystem
Hi Boris,
We are very interested in your I3C subsystem proposal and we would like
to colaborate with you in order to add support for the Synopsys Host
Controller.
We are doing the review for this patch-set and will send our conclusions
as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Vitor Soares
Às 3:16 PM de 12/14/2017, Boris Brezillon escreveu:
> This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C [1] subsystem.
>
> This infrastructure is not complete yet and will be extended over
> time.
>
> There are a few design choices that are worth mentioning because they
> impact the way I3C device drivers can interact with their devices:
>
> - all functions used to send I3C/I2C frames must be called in
> non-atomic context. Mainly done this way to ease implementation, but
> this is still open to discussion. Please let me know if you think it's
> worth considering an asynchronous model here
> - the bus element is a separate object and is not implicitly described
> by the master (as done in I2C). The reason is that I want to be able
> to handle multiple master connected to the same bus and visible to
> Linux.
> In this situation, we should only have one instance of the device and
> not one per master, and sharing the bus object would be part of the
> solution to gracefully handle this case.
> I'm not sure if we will ever need to deal with multiple masters
> controlling the same bus and exposed under Linux, but separating the
> bus and master concept is pretty easy, hence the decision to do it
> now, just in case we need it some day.
> The other benefit of separating the bus and master concepts is that
> master devices appear under the bus directory in sysfs.
> - I2C backward compatibility has been designed to be transparent to I2C
> drivers and the I2C subsystem. The I3C master just registers an I2C
> adapter which creates a new I2C bus. I'd say that, from a
> representation PoV it's not ideal because what should appear as a
> single I3C bus exposing I3C and I2C devices here appears as 2
> different busses connected to each other through the parenting (the
> I3C master is the parent of the I2C and I3C busses).
> On the other hand, I don't see a better solution if we want something
> that is not invasive.
>
> Missing features in this preliminary version:
> - no support for multi-master and the associated concepts (mastership
> handover, support for secondary masters, ...)
> - I2C devices can only be described using DT because this is the only
> use case I have. However, the framework can easily be extended with
> ACPI and board info support
> - I3C slave framework. This has been completely omitted, but shouldn't
> have a huge impact on the I3C framework because I3C slaves don't see
> the whole bus, it's only about handling master requests and generating
> IBIs. Some of the struct, constant and enum definitions could be
> shared, but most of the I3C slave framework logic will be different
>
> Main changes between the initial RFC and this v2 are:
> - Add a generic infrastructure to support IBIs. It's worth mentioning
> that I tried exposing IBIs as a regular IRQs, but after several
> attempts and a discussion with Mark Zyngier, it appeared that it was
> not really fitting in the Linux IRQ model (the fact that you have
> payload attached to IBIs, the fact that most of the time an IBI will
> generate a transfer on the bus which has to be done in an atomic
> context, ...)
> The counterpart of this decision is the latency induced by the
> workqueue approach, but since I don't have real use cases, I don't
> know if this can be a problem or not.
> - Add helpers to support Hot Join
> - Add support for IBIs and Hot Join in Cadence I3C master driver
> - Address several issues in how I was using the device model
>
> I'll finish on a good news: this week the MIPI alliance opened the I3C
> spec. So everyone can now review the patches (no need to be member of
> the MIPI I3C group).
> I'll let you find the link in the doc, this way maybe I'll have reviews
> on the doc itself :-).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
>
> Boris Brezillon (7):
> i2c: Export of_i2c_get_board_info()
> i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure
> docs: driver-api: Add I3C documentation
> i3c: Add sysfs ABI spec
> dt-bindings: i3c: Document core bindings
> i3c: master: Add driver for Cadence IP
> dt-bindings: i3c: Document Cadence I3C master bindings
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i3c | 95 ++
> .../devicetree/bindings/i3c/cdns,i3c-master.txt | 45 +
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/i3c.txt | 128 ++
> Documentation/driver-api/i3c/conf.py | 10 +
> Documentation/driver-api/i3c/device-driver-api.rst | 7 +
> Documentation/driver-api/i3c/index.rst | 9 +
> Documentation/driver-api/i3c/master-driver-api.rst | 8 +
> Documentation/driver-api/i3c/protocol.rst | 201 +++
> Documentation/driver-api/index.rst | 1 +
> drivers/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c | 66 +-
> drivers/i3c/Kconfig | 24 +
> drivers/i3c/Makefile | 4 +
> drivers/i3c/core.c | 573 +++++++
> drivers/i3c/device.c | 344 ++++
> drivers/i3c/internals.h | 34 +
> drivers/i3c/master.c | 1433 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/i3c/master/Kconfig | 5 +
> drivers/i3c/master/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/i3c/master/i3c-master-cdns.c | 1797 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/i2c.h | 10 +
> include/linux/i3c/ccc.h | 380 +++++
> include/linux/i3c/device.h | 321 ++++
> include/linux/i3c/master.h | 564 ++++++
> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 17 +
> 27 files changed, 6053 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i3c
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/cdns,i3c-master.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/i3c.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/conf.py
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/device-driver-api.rst
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/index.rst
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/master-driver-api.rst
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/protocol.rst
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/device.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/internals.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/i3c-master-cdns.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/ccc.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/device.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/master.h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists