linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:11:45 +0800
From:   Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tipbuild@...or.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        LKP <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>* kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to x86_init_ops")
>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  0 files changed
>
>-ENOPATCH?

Ah the script crashed when it tries to indent the new code, since it
assumes

        func_name()
        {
        }

while here it's

        func_name() { }

I'll fix it up.

Thanks,
Fengguang