linux-kernel - Re: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:10:05 +0100
From:   Ywe Cærlyn <email@...-ywecrlyn-m0a.net>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel

Patchmeister Torvalds:

"Or is Intel basically saying "we are committed to selling you shit
forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?"

Back in Celeron days, Intel was popular because you could clock the 
lesser cached Celeron 300mhz to ~500mhz.

Everybody knew then not to get anything pricier. But still Intel sells 
Xeons at 3x the price, for little noticable gain?

Basically I did research on philosophy, and indeed the mainconcept of a 
culture is what determines a cultures behaviour. Even the internal 
design of the cpu seems to be inspired by "God".

I have tried the zén-realized version "Zün", instead, God of absolute 
reality. Because regressions in philosophy, is regressions in computing, 
is ultimately Bill Gates talking about fecal water.

-- 
Fredelige hilsener,
Ywe Cærlyn,