linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77965: Add #interrupt-cells property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:02:44 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:     jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77965: Add #interrupt-cells
 property

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:06:07AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:27:16AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org> wrote:
> > > Add "#interrupt-cells" property and "interrupt-controller" label to
> > > "interrupt-controller@...c0000" device node.
> > >
> > > This silences the following DTC compiler warnings:
> > > Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-controller or
> > > interrupt-map property in /soc/interrupt-controller@...c0000
> > > Warning (interrupts_property): Missing #interrupt-cells in
> > > interrupt-parent /soc/interrupt-controller@...c000
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > @@ -316,6 +316,8 @@
> > >                 };
> > >
> > >                 intc_ex: interrupt-controller@...c0000 {
> > > +                       #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > +                       interrupt-controller;
> > >                         reg = <0 0xe61c0000 0 0x200>;
> > >                         /* placeholder */
> >
> > (bikeshedding) Should the placeholder be at the top of the node?
> 
> I would like it more too, but in M3-W dtsi:
> 
> 		pciec0: pcie@...00000 {
> 			reg = <0 0xfe000000 0 0x80000>;
> 			/* placeholder */
> 		};
> 
> So I kept using the same style everywhere here.
> 
> I can change it everywhere in this series to have placeholder at the
> beginning of the node definition if you agree with that!

Either way is fine by me. But if we do change it lets change it everywhere.