linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:41:05 +0000
From:   James Ettle <james@...le.org.uk>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hello,

I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!)

Thanks,
James.

On 23 February 2018 01:05:45 GMT+00:00, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:39:43AM +0000, James Ettle wrote:
>> I only really posted this as a demo of a fix. I was hoping someone
>who actually knows what they're doing in the kernel would pick it up
>and make it proper.
>
>Whoops, sorry, I didn't realize that.
>
>But I don't see a problem with the patch as it is.  Are you OK with me
>adding your signed-off-by?
>
>--b.
>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> James.
>> 
>> 
>> On 22 February 2018 04:17:23 GMT+00:00, Stephen Rothwell
><sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Commit
>> >
>> >  35da1ba8af70 ("sunrpc: Fix unaligned access on sparc64")
>> >
>> >is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Cheers,
>> >Stephen Rothwell