linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Keep returning EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:24:35 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Keep returning EPROBE_DEFER when we should

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:17:15AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>>
> This is slightly embarrassing, but that patch doesn't actually fix
> anything. I tried to be smart and rework it to look nicer, and
> obviously failed.
>
> Can you squash
> http://code.bulix.org/z1vkt1-286673
>
> in the commit?

This site is down. Can you send a new version of the patch or
just reply with the change inline here?

Yours,
Linus Walleij