linux-kernel - Re: [07/18] thunderbolt: Handle rejected Thunderbolt devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:38:02 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jeremy McNicoll <jmcnicol@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Mario.Limonciello@...l.com,
        Radion Mirchevsky <radion.mirchevsky@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [07/18] thunderbolt: Handle rejected Thunderbolt devices

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:20:29PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:17:38PM -0800, Jeremy McNicoll wrote:
> > > +	if (pkg->link_info & ICM_LINK_INFO_REJECTED) {
> > > +		tb_info(tb, "switch at %u.%u was rejected by ICM firmware\n",
> > > +			link, depth);
> > 
> > This kind of condition sounds more like an error instead of info.
> > Please bump this up to tb_WARN/tb_warn ideally tb_err().
> 
> No, this is not an error.

To be more clear, it is totally fine to have the firmware to reject some
devices. For example in case of the new usbonly security level the
firmware rejects other devices but the first.