linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/54] 4.14.23-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 19:36:18 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/54] 4.14.23-stable review

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:38:59AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 05:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:59:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 02/26/2018 12:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.23 release.
> > > > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 28 20:21:22 UTC 2018.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > microblaze, m32r:
> > > 
> > > include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:8:2: warning: #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN [-Wcpp]
> > >   #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > >    ^~~~~~~
> > > /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.14/build/lib/find_bit.c:176:15: error: redefinition of ‘find_next_zero_bit_le’
> > > 
> > > v4.15 is also affected (m32r builds in v4.15, though, for some reason).
> > 
> > This sounds like Arnd's Kbuild change 101110f6271c ("Kbuild: always
> > define endianess in kconfig.h")
> > 
> > Does this problem also show up in Linus's tree?
> > 
> > Arnd, any ideas?
> > 
> 
> Missing for m32r: c95f121142a41c951fd62683a5574f2a7b37c573
> Missing for microblaze: 71e7673dadfdae0605d4c1f66ecb4b045c79fe0f

Thanks, both queued up, and I've pushed out new 4.14.y and 4.15.y trees.

greg k-h