lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:23:45 +1100
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
        Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@...cle.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] vfio, dax: prevent long term filesystem-dax
 pins and other fixes

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 08:19:54PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> The following series implements...
> Changes since v3 [1]:
> 
> * Kill IS_DAX() in favor of explicit IS_FSDAX() and IS_DEVDAX() helpers.
>   Jan noted, "having IS_DAX() and IS_FSDAX() doing almost the same, just
>   not exactly the same, is IMHO a recipe for confusion", and I agree. A
>   nice side effect of this elimination is a cleanup to remove occasions of
>   "#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX" in C files, it is all moved to header files
>   now. (Jan)

Dan, can you please stop sending random patches in a patch set to
random lists?  Your patchsets are hitting 4 or 5 different procmail
filters here and so it gets split across several different mailing
list buckets. It's really annoying to have to go reconstruct every
patch set you send back into a single series in a single bucket....

Can you please fix up your patch set sending again?

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ