linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Split page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Mar 2018 15:44:12 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Split page_type out from mapcount

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:17:50AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:31:53 -0800
> Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> > 
> > I want to use the _mapcount field to record what a page is in use as.
> > This can help with debugging and we can also expose that information to
> > userspace through /proc/kpageflags to help diagnose memory usage (not
> > included as part of this patch set).
> > 
> > First, we need s390 to stop using _mapcount for its own purposes;
> > Martin, I hope you have time to look at this patch.  I must confess I
> > don't quite understand what the different bits are used for in the upper
> > nybble of the _mapcount, but I tried to replicate what you were doing
> > faithfully.
> 
> Yeah, that is a nasty bit of code. On s390 we have 2K page tables (pte)
> but 4K pages. If we use full pages for the pte tables we waste 2K of
> memory for each of the tables. So we allocate 4K and split it into two
> 2K pieces. Now we have to keep track of the pieces to be able to free
> them again.

Have you considered to use slab for page table allocation instead?
IIRC some architectures practice this already.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov