lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 20:18:18 +0000
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] x86/kvm/vmx: read MSR_FS_BASE from current->thread

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> vmx_save_host_state() is only called from kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() so
> the context is pretty well defined
>

True.

> and MSR_FS_BASE should always be
> equal to current->thread.fsbase.

Not true.  current->thread.fsbase is almost entirely undefined in this
context.  What you *could* do is export save_fsgs() and call it first.
When FSGSBASE support lands (which will happen eventually!), the code
in your patch will be completely wrong.

Admittedly, your patch isn't 100% bogus, but the reason is subtle and
you need lots of comments there *and* in save_fsgs().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ