lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:20:00 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: stmmac: use correct barrier between
 coherent memory and MMIO

Hi!

Thanks for doing the detective work!

> This barrier cannot be a simple dma_wmb(), since a dma_wmb() is only
> used to guarantee the ordering, with respect to other writes,
> to cache coherent DMA memory.

Could you explain this a bit more (and perhaps in code comment)?

Ensuring other writes are done before writing the "GO!" bit should be
enough, no?

(If it is not, do we need heavier barriers in other places, too?)

Best regards,
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ