linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:54:38 +0100 (CET)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>
cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Evgenii Shatokhin wrote:

> Hi,

Hi,
 
> > The atomic replace allows to create cumulative patches. They
> > are useful when you maintain many livepatches and want to remove
> > one that is lower on the stack. In addition it is very useful when
> > more patches touch the same function and there are dependencies
> > between them.
> 
> I have experimented with this updated patchset a bit.
> It looks like replace operation fails if there is a loaded but disabled patch.
> 
> Suppose there are 2 binary patches changing the same kernel functions. Load
> patch1, then disable it (echo 0 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/patch1/enabled), then
> try load patch2 with atomic replace. I get "Device or resource busy" error at
> this point.
> 
> It seems, __klp_enable_patch() returns -EBUSY for some reason. I haven't dug
> deeper into that code yet.

Yes, it is "enforce stacking" check in __klp_enable_patch():

        /* enforce stacking: only the first disabled patch can be enabled */
        if (patch->list.prev != &klp_patches &&
            !list_prev_entry(patch, list)->enabled)
                return -EBUSY;

So not connected to this patch set. We've had the behaviour for quite some 
time.

Miroslav
 
> A workaround is simple: just unload all disabled patches before trying to load
> patch2 with replace. Still, the behavior is quite strange.