linux-kernel - Re: Regression in IPMI on 4.15.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Mar 2018 15:54:50 -0800
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:     minyard@....org
Cc:     openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in IPMI on 4.15.6

On 03/06/2018 09:19 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 03/06/2018 11:17 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 11:39 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2018 01:31 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>> On 03/05/2018 01:07 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>> On 03/02/2018 05:46 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/28/2018 01:07 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02/28/2018 08:17 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 02/28/2018 07:53 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/27/2018 05:55 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fedora got a bug report of a crash in IPMI on 4.15.6
>>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549316
>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, it's only a screenshot but it's fairly
>>>>>>>>>> clear. It looks like a panic in the error handling path
>>>>>>>>>> in platform_device_unregister. Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You may also run into another issue.  You can pull the
>>>>>>>> individual patch at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi.git c8a1972e77dbe321ce5ce0247056e727234cbaec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, it needed a few more tweaks.  Can you do change
>>>>>>> 426fa6179dae677134dfb37b21d057819418515b
>>>>>>> instead?  It's "ipmi: Fix some error cleanup issues"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can send you patches, if you like.  If you could test and get back
>>>>>>> to me, that would be great.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laura, have you had a chance to test this?  I'd like to get it in soon,
>>>>>> if possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -corey
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think "ipmi: Re-use existing macros for built-in properties" is broken:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That particular requires some new stuff.  I was just wanting you to pull that individual patch,
>>>> not the whole branch.  I can just send the two patches, if you like.
>>>
>>> Or, I just pulled in 4.15.6 and cherry picked those two patches to:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi.git fix-pdev-unreg
>>>
>>> Hopefully that makes things easier.
>>>
>>> -corey
>>>
>>
>> Yes, the reporter said it worked fine.
>>
> 
> It would be helpful to me to have a "Tested-by" line.  Can I put one in?
> If so, whose name/email do I use?
> 
> Thanks for testing.
> 
> -corey


You can use the reporter and tester:

Tested-by: Bill Perkins <wmp@...wood.net>