lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:12:36 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 03/34] mtd: nand: gpmi: Fix failure when a erased
 page has a bitflip at BBM

On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:22:30 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 09:50 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit fdf2e821052958a114618a95ab18a300d0b080cb ]
> > 
> > When erased subpages are read then the BCH decoder returns STATUS_ERASED
> > if they are all empty, or STATUS_UNCORRECTABLE if there are bitflips.
> > When there are bitflips, we have to set these bits again to show the
> > upper layers a completely erased page. When a bitflip happens in the
> > exact byte where the bad block marker is, then this byte is swapped
> > with another byte in block_mark_swapping(). The correction code then
> > detects a bitflip in another subpage and no longer corrects the bitflip
> > where it really happens.  
> [...]
> 
> This seesm to be a bug fix for commit bd2e778c9ee3 "gpmi-nand: Handle
> ECC Errors in erased pages".  That's not in 4.4 so the bug fix is not
> needed, though it doesn't appear to do any harm.

I wonder why the fix was backported to stable releases in the first
place. AFAICS, there's no Cc-stable or Fixes tag in the original
commit. It's probably something in the backport-to-stable process I'm
not aware of.

Anyway, not an issues since the changes seems to be harmless.

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ