lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Mar 2018 12:13:56 -0600 (CST)
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
cc:     penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Fix misleading 'age' in verbose slub prints

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:

> In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
> otherwise. This could be because, while printing
> this info, we print allocation traces first and
> free traces thereafter. In between, if we get schedule
> out, (jiffies - t->when) could become meaningless.

Ok then get the jiffies earlier?

> So, simply print when the object was allocated/freed.

The tick value may not related to anything in the logs that is why the
"age" is there. How do I know how long ago the allocation was if I look at
the log and only see long and large number of ticks since bootup?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ