| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 08:41:59 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, evgreen@...omium.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/debug: Fix registers on sleeping tasks
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 05/03/18 23:43, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> This is the equivalent of commit 001bf455d206 ("ARM: 8428/1: kgdb: Fix
>> registers on sleeping tasks") but for arm64. Nuff said.
>>
>> ...well, perhaps I could also add that task_pt_regs are userspace
>> registers and that's not what kgdb is supposed to be reporting. We're
>> supposed to be reporting kernel registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
>
> I hacked together a (still very immature) kgdb test suite[1] around the turn
> of the year. Whilst its not quite solid enough for me to recommend others
> deploy it except out of curiosity... so I haven't yet started yelling about
> test suite failures except in the privacy of my own head.
>
> However I can confirm that this patch fixes one of the test suite failures I
> haven't had time to blame allocate yet!
>
> So...
> Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Thanks for your testing! ...I'll have to check out your test suite soon.
> BTW is this something that should Cc: stable?
It wouldn't hurt if this made it back to stable on a best-effort
approach. The problem has been there since the beginning, so it's not
like it's fixing a regression that cropped up in a specific version.
...but it does fix a bug, so probably Cc stable makes sense. I guess
I'd leave it up to the maintainer that applies the patch?
-Doug<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar
8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Thompson <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:daniel.thompson@...aro.org"
target="_blank">daniel.thompson@...aro.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On
05/03/18 23:43, Douglas Anderson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This is the equivalent of commit 001bf455d206 ("ARM: 8428/1: kgdb: Fix<br>
registers on sleeping tasks") but for arm64. Nuff said.<br>
<br>
...well, perhaps I could also add that task_pt_regs are userspace<br>
registers and that's not what kgdb is supposed to be reporting. We're<br>
supposed to be reporting kernel registers.<br>
<br>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <<a
href="mailto:dianders@...omium.org"
target="_blank">dianders@...omium.org</a>><br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I hacked together a (still very immature) kgdb test suite[1] around
the turn of the year. Whilst its not quite solid enough for me to
recommend others deploy it except out of curiosity... so I haven't yet
started yelling about test suite failures except in the privacy of my
own head.<br>
<br>
However I can confirm that this patch fixes one of the test suite
failures I haven't had time to blame allocate yet!<br>
<br>
So...<br>
Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <<a
href="mailto:daniel.thompson@...aro.org"
target="_blank">daniel.thompson@...aro.org</a>><br>
<br>
BTW is this something that should Cc: stable?<br>
<br>
<br>
Daniel.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://github.com/daniel-thompson/kgdbtest"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://github.com/daniel-thompson/kgdbtest&source=gmail&ust=1520613443900000&usg=AFQjCNHzh_tGdP65DdFEQo-ofF_LCI5XBQ">https://github.com/daniel-thom<wbr>pson/kgdbtest</a><div
class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
---<br>
<br>
Changes in v2:<br>
- Init cpu_context in one line<br>
- Explain that task_pt_regs are userspace<br>
<br>
arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----<br>
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)<br>
<br>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c<br>
index 2122cd187f19..a20de58061a8 100644<br>
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c<br>
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c<br>
@@ -138,14 +138,25 @@ int dbg_set_reg(int regno, void *mem, struct
pt_regs *regs)<br>
void<br>
sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(un<wbr>signed long *gdb_regs,
struct task_struct *task)<br>
{<br>
- struct pt_regs *thread_regs;<br>
+ struct cpu_context *cpu_context =
&task->thread.cpu_context;<br>
/* Initialize to zero */<br>
memset((char *)gdb_regs, 0, NUMREGBYTES);<br>
- thread_regs = task_pt_regs(task);<br>
- memcpy((void *)gdb_regs, (void
*)thread_regs->regs, GP_REG_BYTES);<br>
- /* Special case for PSTATE (check comments
in asm/kgdb.h for details) */<br>
- dbg_get_reg(33, gdb_regs + GP_REG_BYTES,
thread_regs);<br>
+<br>
+ gdb_regs[19] = cpu_context->x19;<br>
+ gdb_regs[20] = cpu_context->x20;<br>
+ gdb_regs[21] = cpu_context->x21;<br>
+ gdb_regs[22] = cpu_context->x22;<br>
+ gdb_regs[23] = cpu_context->x23;<br>
+ gdb_regs[24] = cpu_context->x24;<br>
+ gdb_regs[25] = cpu_context->x25;<br>
+ gdb_regs[26] = cpu_context->x26;<br>
+ gdb_regs[27] = cpu_context->x27;<br>
+ gdb_regs[28] = cpu_context->x28;<br>
+ gdb_regs[29] = cpu_context->fp;<br>
+<br>
+ gdb_regs[31] = cpu_context->sp;<br>
+ gdb_regs[32] = cpu_context->pc;<br>
}<br>
void kgdb_arch_set_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc)<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists