linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/11] Staging: iio: accel: Add comments about units in data read function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:58:19 +0530
From:   Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, knaack.h@....de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.baluta@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Staging: iio: accel: Add comments about units in
 data read function

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:50:30PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Mar 2018 13:19:29 +0530
> Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Clarify the conversion and formation of resultant data in the
> > adis16201_read_raw() with sufficient comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
> This is fine but it needs to be in the original comment changing patch
> rather than removing the comments first then a few patches later putting
> back a different version.
> 
> So good change but in the wrong place in the series.  Learning to reorder
> a series and merge down multiple patches into one is very useful when
> working with git.

I will send v2 with all the updates!

What about sign_extend32 & reverse christmas ordering patch ? Will you
pick that up or shall I send them again ?

-- 
Thanks
Himanshu Jha