linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] [PATCH 2/8] Documentations: dt-bindings: Add a document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed AST24xx/25xx SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:47:01 -0800
From:   Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Milton Miller II <miltonm@...ibm.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, jdelvare@...e.com,
        arnd@...db.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...id.au,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] [PATCH 2/8] Documentations: dt-bindings: Add a
 document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed AST24xx/25xx SoCs

Hi Milton,

Thanks for sharing your time to review this patch. Please see my answer 
inline.

Jae

On 3/9/2018 3:41 PM, Milton Miller II wrote:
> About  03/07/2018 04:12PM in some time zone, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] [PATCH 2/8] Documentations: dt-bindings:
>> Add a document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed AST24xx/25xx SoCs
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>>> Are these SoCs x86-based?
>>>
>>> Yes, these are ARM SoCs. Please see Andrew's answer as well.
>>
>> Understood, thanks.
>>
>>>>> +	Read sampling point selection. The whole period of a bit time
>> will be
>>>>> +	divided into 16 time frames. This value will determine which
>> time frame
>>>>> +	this controller will sample PECI signal for data read back.
>> Usually in
>>>>> +	the middle of a bit time is the best.
>>>>
>>>> English? "This value will determine when this controller"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could I change it like below?:
>>>
>>> "This value will determine in which time frame this controller
>> samples PECI
>>> signal for data read back"
>>
>> I guess... I'm not native speaker, I guess this could be improved
>> some
>> more.
>>
> 
> I agree this wording is still confusing.
> 
> The problem is that the key subject, the time of the sampling, is in the descriptive clause "in which time frame".
> 
> "This value will determine the time frame in which the controller will sample"
> 
> or perhaps phrase it as saving a specific sample from the over-clock, or a phase of the clock.
> 

Yes, that looks more better. I'll change the wording as you suggested. 
Thanks a lot!

Jae

>> Best regards,
>> 									Pavel
>>
>> -- 
>> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>> (cesky, pictures)
>> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>>
> 
> milton
> --
> Speaking for myself not IBM.
>