linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/12] efi: make const array 'apple' static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:31:15 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] efi: make const array 'apple' static


* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:

> On 9 March 2018 at 08:04, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > Also, would it make sense to rename it to something more descriptive like
> >> > "apple_unicode_str[]" or so?
> >> >
> >> > Plus an unicode string literal initializer would be pretty descriptive as well,
> >> > instead of the weird looking character array, i.e. something like:
> >> >
> >> >   static efi_char16_t const apple_unicode_str[] = u"Apple";
> >> >
> >> > ... or so?
> >> >
> >>
> >> is u"xxx" the same as L"xxx"?
> >
> > So "L" literals map to wchar_t, which wide character type is implementation
> > specific IIRC, could be 16-bit or 32-bit wide.
> >
> > u"" literals OTOH are specified by the C11 spec to be char16_t, i.e. 16-bit wide
> > characters - which I assume is the EFI type as well?
> >
> >> In any case, this is for historical reasons: at some point (and I
> >> don't remember the exact details) we had a conflict at link time with
> >> objects using 4 byte wchar_t, so we started using this notation to be
> >> independent of the size of wchar_t. That issue no longer exists so we
> >> should be able to get rid of this.
> >
> > Yes, my guess is that those problems were due to L"xyz" mapping to wchar_t and
> > having a different type in the kernel build and the host build side - but u"xyz"
> > should solve that.
> >
> 
> Excellent!

Please double check the generated code though, all of this is from memory.

> Do you mind taking this patch as is? I will follow up with a patch
> that updates all occurrences of this pattern (we have a few of them),
> i.e., use u"" notation and move them to file scope.

Sure, done!

Thanks,

	Ingo