lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:57:51 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        sboyd@...nel.org, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Add 1.6GHz PLL rate

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org> wrote:
> We need this rate to generate 100, 200, and 228.57MHz from the same
> PLL. 228.57MHz is useful for a pixel clock when the VPLL is used for
> and external display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Looks good to me.  I spent a little bit of time poking at this and I
agreed it's the best way to make 1.6 GHz in
<http://crosreview.com/956677>.  Lin Huang at Rockchip also said:

> yes, we also use this setting for 1.6GHz in our internal branch.

...and they seem to agree this is a sane setting.  Thus:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists