lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:20:04 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Kieran Bingham' <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/11] media: vsp1: use kernel __packed for structures

From: Kieran Bingham
> Sent: 09 March 2018 22:04
> The kernel provides a __packed definition to abstract away from the
> compiler specific attributes tag.
> 
> Convert all packed structures in VSP1 to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> index 37e2c984fbf3..382e45c2054e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> @@ -29,19 +29,19 @@
>  struct vsp1_dl_header_list {
>  	u32 num_bytes;
>  	u32 addr;
> -} __attribute__((__packed__));
> +} __packed;
> 
>  struct vsp1_dl_header {
>  	u32 num_lists;
>  	struct vsp1_dl_header_list lists[8];
>  	u32 next_header;
>  	u32 flags;
> -} __attribute__((__packed__));
> +} __packed;
> 
>  struct vsp1_dl_entry {
>  	u32 addr;
>  	u32 data;
> -} __attribute__((__packed__));
> +} __packed;

Do these structures ever actually appear in misaligned memory?
If they don't then they shouldn't be marked 'packed'.

	David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ