linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:36:45 +0100
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "Tautschnig, Michael" <tautschn@...zon.co.uk>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Tautschnig, Michael wrote:
> 
> > All definitions of syscalls in x86 except for those patched here have
> > already been using the appropriate SYSCALL_DEFINE*.
> 
> Dominik, do you have more urgent stuff queued in that area?
> 
> If yes, please add: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> If not, I simply route it through x86/urgent for 4.16.

Thanks for asking! Nothing urgent from my side, only stuff for 4.17, so it
would be great if you could route it through x86/urgent.

Thanks,
	Dominik